Does U.S. Capitalism Only Work When the Profits are Privatized and the Risks are Socialized?
Friday, January 22nd, 2010The Financial Times in the United Kingdom is especially critical of our taxpayer bailouts:
http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2008/07/the-rescue-of-fannie-and-freddie-by-hankie-and-feddie/
http://blogs.ft.com/maverecon/2008/07/time-for-comrade-paulson-the-pull-the-plug-on-the-fannie-and-freddie-charade/
Evidence of the latest bailout:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/washington/15fannie.html?hp
The case against Fannie and Freddie begins with their peculiar status: although they’re private companies with stockholders and profits, they’re “government-sponsored enterprises” established by federal law, which means that they receive special privileges.
The most important of these privileges is implicit: it’s the belief of investors that if Fannie and Freddie are threatened with failure, the federal government will come to their rescue.
This implicit guarantee means that profits are privatized but losses are socialized.
If Fannie and Freddie do well, their stockholders reap the benefits, but if things go badly, Washington picks up the tab. Heads they win, tails we lose.
Paul Krugman
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/14/opinion/14krugman.html?_r=1&oref=slogin